Dear Senator Conroy

13 12 2008

I have a shopping list for you. It’s pretty small, and pretty simple, but it provides your government some options on where to place your financial resources. You see, I feel you have lost your way financially, as you seem determined to implement an internet filter that will cost millions, slow down the internet, increase the cost to consumers and service providers alike, and could even lead to the loss of jobs. I really don’t think that’s what we need in our current economic climate.

So this simple shopping list might give you a hint at some areas where you might win some votes, rather than lose them, and still provide huge benefits to the future of Australia’s children.

ConroyShoppingList.YUH7CUP2FnDg.jpg

Childcare
Rather than damage the ISP industry, why not throw financial resources into assisting families struggling to find adequate childcare, rather than let a bad situation get worse once ABC Childcare closes its doors? Here is an industry that provides invaluable care to children, which is quite clearly struggling.

Education
It is nice that Mr Rudd has provided a boost to TAFE and Universities recently, but how about greater support for other educational institutions, particularly those that provide the fundamentals? Your government already acknowledges that some schools are ‘doing it tough’, but rather than just rating them or throwing a laptop or two their way, why not invest in a real and meaningful way in the educational future of our children?

Environment
Again, it’s nice that your government ratified the Kyoto Protocol, but to ensure the children of today grow up in an Australia that is not ravaged by global warming, it might be nice if there was some action. For example, you could build a solar plant, or at least support the industry. It was annoying to see on the 7.30 report recently a story about solar generation innovations made in Los Angeles being implemented by a former Australian who couldn’t find a market here. Besides the positive environmental impact, there is also the assistance that would come through boosting a fledgling industry, generating jobs, and indeed helping to build an intelligent industry which will have a flow on effect to our academic institutions through the need for higher learning.

Indigenous Australians
I’m sure that someone sitting in an office in Canberra thought an indigenous intervention would generate great publicity for the government, but what have you really done to ensure that the health, well-being and safety of indigenous children in Australia is no longer at risk? While the media has been silent on the subject for some time, last mention it received was far from positive. I’m sure an internet filter is far more important than that, right?

Health
We keep hearing that childhood obesity is a problem. We keep hearing that younger people are abusing alcohol. We keep hearing about all these issues, and we also hear of proposed solutions, but nothing seems to happen. There’s plenty of opportunity here, Senator Conroy, for your government to take a stand on one (or more) of the many health issues affecting children and teens, and do some good for our children.

I don’t have a problem paying my taxes, but I really would rather you spend them wisely, rather than just throw money away on a system that just won’t work.





Australia’s bright shining future?

6 06 2008

I’m in a ranting mood tonight, so bear with me.

So why is it so hard for the Australian Government to bite the bullet and invest in renewable, environmentally conscious technologies. What is it about this whole issue that makes it just so damned hard, or is it just human nature to take the easiest option?

I take issue with the fact that ACTEWAGL are actively planning a “Canberra Technology City” which includes technologies invented in the 1930’s! I find it laughable that the term “Technology” can be applied to any concept which includes on-site generation of power using natural gas turbines. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re not burning coal, but creating a new power solution based on a non-renewable fossil fuel, utilising a method which does have a relatively sizeable carbon footprint when compared to modern renewable power generation, and invented almost 80 years ago is just hypocritical, and quite frankly, moronic. But it really exemplifies the thought process that goes in to all planning in Australia. Renewable energy sources are just “too hard” for Australia.

I’m not going to debate climate change here, because quite frankly I’m sick of the debate and just want some action. Climate change aside, it’s no secret that Fossil Fuels are in finite supply, so why are we not evolving beyond our reliance upon them now that viable alternate technologies exist? Everybody is complaining about the cost of petrol, yet I don’t see any great push towards hybrid or electronic cars. Again, it’s all too hard for Australia, and it’s this attitude that is going to leave us behind.

Australia is a net importer of fuel products based on fossil fuels. We need to be more intelligent into the future. We need to realise the implications of tying ourselves to a source of power which is beyond our physical and economic control, and tap into the resources that we have on hand. And what are some of the most pleantiful resources available in Australia? Sun, and space. Let’s be more intelligence, more “technological” about our approach to future energy needs, and break our reliance on fossil fuels and importing from overseas markets, and build towards a more reliant and economically stable future.

How does this not make sense?